About the model
This model was developed in collaboration with Carl Bergstrom and Ryan McGee from the University of Washington. This model can be used to simulate infection dynamics of SARS-CoV-2, and evaluate the impact different testing strategies and vaccination has on outbreaks in populations. This model is used in Color’s Proactive testing in a partially vaccinated population memo, you can learn more about the model and proactive testing here:
SEIRS+ model
This interactive modeling tool uses a modified version of the SEIRS+ model, which was developed by Ryan McGee, Carl Bergstrom, and colleagues at the University of Washington.
SEIR models are epidemiological models that are used to model the spread of disease in a population. Standard SEIR models are compartmental models, meaning they track the proportion of the population in different disease states over time. SEIR models include compartments for susceptible (S), exposed (E), infectious (I), and recovered (R) disease states.
The SEIRS+ model is an extended SEIR model, which incorporates the effects of stochastic dynamics, network structure, SARS-CoV-2 testing, and additional interventions in a population.
Further information and code for the SEIRS+ model framework can be found at:
Model parameters
The parameter values and descriptions used in the models are listed in the table below.
Table 1. Table of parameters included in model
Parameter |
Mean Value |
Description |
R0 |
2.25 (default, can be changed) |
The R0, or reproductive number, is the expected average number of secondary infectious cases produced by a single infectious case. This level of baseline transmissibility (R0=1.5) assumes that basic mitigation strategies, such as mask-wearing and social distancing, are in place. |
Latent period |
3.0 days |
The time from exposure to when the individual becomes infectious to others. |
Presymptomatic infectious period |
2.2 days 1,2 |
The period when an individual infected with SARS-CoV-2 is contagious but has not yet developed symptoms. |
Infectious period |
6.2 days 2–5 |
The time period during which an infected individual is infectious to others. For symptomatic cases, this includes the presymptomatic period. |
Test sensitivity |
75% while presymptomatic, 90% during first 3 days of infectious period, and decreasing thereafter.6,7 |
Probability that a single test will correctly identify an infectious individual as having SARS-CoV-2. |
Testing Compliance |
100% |
Probability that an individual will comply with testing, if any. |
Percent asymptomatic |
30% |
Percentage of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 who do not develop symptoms. |
Percent symptomatic who self-quarantine |
20% |
Percentage of symptomatic individuals who develop sufficient symptoms (i.e., fever) that they call in sick and stay home from work. |
Test turnaround time |
1 day |
Length of time between testing and isolation for individuals who receive positive results. |
Isolation Time |
10 days 8,9 |
Isolation time for individuals who receive a positive test result, self-isolate due to symptoms, or quarantine in response to a known positive contact. |
Vaccine Effectiveness |
90% (default, can be adjusted) |
Percentage of vaccinated individuals in which the vaccine takes effect. |
Limitations
Modeling can be extremely important to help us understand epidemic progression, however, all models have assumptions, limitations, and biases that make them imperfect estimates. While we do our best to pick the most accurate and evidence-based parameters about SARS-CoV-2 disease spread, estimates for these parameters vary and may change as we learn more about the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Because these parameter choices can have significant impacts on model outcomes, we cannot guarantee our choices are always correct, and any results produced by this model should not be interpreted to predict exact numbers of cases or outcomes.
We describe the limitations of our model in further detail in our pre-print.
References
- Tindale L, Coombe M, Stockdale JE, et al. Transmission interval estimates suggest pre-symptomatic spread of COVID-19. Epidemiology. Published online March 6, 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.03.03.20029983
- He X, Lau EHY, Wu P, et al. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020;26(5):672-675.
- Wölfel R, Corman VM, Guggemos W, et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020;581(7809):465-469.
- Ganyani T, Kremer C, Chen D, et al. Estimating the generation interval for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on symptom onset data, March 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(17). doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.17.2000257
- Young BE, Ong SWX, Kalimuddin S, et al. Epidemiologic Features and Clinical Course of Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore. JAMA. Published online March 3, 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3204
- Wikramaratna P, Paton RS, Ghafari M, Lourenco J. Estimating false-negative detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Epidemiology. Published online April 7, 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.04.05.20053355
- Kucirka LM, Lauer SA, Laeyendecker O, Boon D, Lessler J. Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure. Ann Intern Med. Published online May 13, 2020. doi:10.7326/M20-1495
- CDC. Duration of isolation and precautions for adults with COVID-19. Published December 1, 2020. Accessed December 16, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/duration-isolation.html
- CDC. Options to reduce quarantine for contacts of persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection using symptom monitoring and diagnostic testing. Published December 2, 2020. Accessed December 16, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/more/scientific-brief-options-to-reduce-quarantine.html